Àá½Ã¸¸ ±â´Ù·Á ÁÖ¼¼¿ä. ·ÎµùÁßÀÔ´Ï´Ù.

°³¿¡¼­ ±¸³» ½Å¿¬ÀåÄ¡¸¦ ÀÌ¿ëÇÑ Ä¡Á¶°ñÁõ´ë¼ú

ALVEOLAR RIDGE AUGMENTATION USING INTRAORAL DISTRACTION DEVICE IN DOGS

´ëÇѱ¸°­¾Ç¾È¸é¿Ü°úÇÐȸÁö 1999³â 25±Ç 3È£ p.261 ~ 266
¼Ò¼Ó »ó¼¼Á¤º¸
¿ÀÈñ±Õ ¿ÀÀ¯±Ù/Á¤Çö/À¯¼±¿­/ÃÖÈ«¶õ/¿ÀÈñ±Õ/¿ÀÀ¯±Ù/Á¤Çö/À¯¼±¿­

Abstract

°á·Ð
Ä¡Á¶°ñÁõ´ë¼úÀ» À§ÇØ »õ·Î °í¾ÈÇÑ ±¸³» ½Å¿¬ÀåÄ¡ÀÇ »ç¿ë °¡´É¼º°ú À¯¿ë¼ºÀ» Æò°¡Çϱâ À§
ÇÏ¿©, °³ÀÇ ÇÏ¾Ç ±¸Ä¡ºÎ¿¡¼­ ±¸³» ½Å¿¬ÀåÄ¡¸¦ ÀÌ¿ëÇÏ¿© Ä¡Á¶°ñÀÇ ³ôÀ̸¦ Áõ´ë½ÃÅ°°í ½Å¿¬
¿Ï·á 8ÁÖÈÄ¿¡ ÀÓ»óÀû, ¹æ»ç¼±ÇÐÀû ¹× Á¶Á÷ÇÐÀûÀ¸·Î °Ë»çÇÏ¿© ´ÙÀ½°ú °°Àº °á°ú¸¦ ¾ò¾ú´Ù.
¸ðµç ½ÇÇ赿¹°¿¡¼­ °¨¿° µî º°´Ù¸¥ ÇÕº´ÁõÀº ¹ß»ýÇÏÁö ¾Ê¾Ò´Ù. Æò±Õ ½Å¿¬°Å¸®´Â 7.6¡¾1.4
§®¿´´Ù. ¸ðµç ½ÇÇ赿¹°ÀÇ ½Å¿¬ºÎÀ§¿¡¼­ ½Å»ý°ñÀÌ Çü¼ºµÇ¾ú´Ù. ½Å¿¬ºÎÀ§¿¡¼­ °ñ°³Á¶°¡ °üÂûµÇ
¾úÀ¸³ª Ä¡Á¶Á¤ ºÎÀ§ÀÇ Èí¼ö´Â ³ªÅ¸³ªÁö ¾Ê¾Ò´Ù. ÀϺΠ½ÇÇ赿¹°¿¡¼­´Â ½Å¿¬ ºÎÀ§ÀÇ ÇùÃø ÇÇ
Áú°ñ¿¡¼­ °ñ¸·°ú ¿¬°áµÈ ¼¶À¯Á¶Á÷ÀÇ ¹ÌÀÔÀÌ °üÂûµÇ¾ú´Ù.
ÀÌ»óÀÇ °á°ú´Â »õ·Î °í¾ÈÇÑ ±¸³» ½Å¿¬ÀåÄ¡°¡ ÅðÃàµÈ Ä¡Á¶°ñÀÇ Áõ´ë¼ú¿¡ À¯¿ëÇÏ°Ô »ç¿ëµÉ
¼ö ÀÖÀ½À» ½Ã»çÇÏ¿´´Ù.

The aim of this study was to show the feasibility and potential advantages of using
the new intraoral distraction device for alveolar ridge augmentation.
Four adult mongrel dogs were used. We designed intraoral distraction device for
augmentation of vertical height of the edentulous ridge. The left upper and lower
premolars and first molars were extracted and an alveoloplasty was performed to
simulate an atrophic ridge. After 12 weeks of healing, an osteotomy was made and the
intraoral distraction device was applied in order to distract alveolar segment upward. A
permucosal pin was exposed intraorally. Latency period was allowed for 7 days before
distraction began. The distraction device was activated with a rate of 1.0 §®/day for 9
days. At 2 weeks after completion of the distraction, the device was removed. At 8
weeks after distraction, the animals were sacrificed. Clinical, radiographic, and histologic
examinations were performed.
Macroscopically, no significant abnormalities such as infection were occurred in the
distracted area. The average distracted distance was 7.6¡¾1.4 §® and new bone was
formed in the distracted gap in all animals. Bone remodeling without crestal bone
resorption was observed in the distracted area. In several animals, fibrous tissue was
present in the buccal cortical bone area.
These results suggest that the intraoral diatraction device may have the potential for
use in augmentation of the atrophic edentulous ridge.

Å°¿öµå

Alveolar ridge augmentation; Intraoral distraction device; Distraction osteogenesis;

¿ø¹® ¹× ¸µÅ©¾Æ¿ô Á¤º¸

  

µîÀçÀú³Î Á¤º¸

KCI
KoreaMed